Once again, this is where an organization interludes into science, and once again, that organization is continuing to get its ass handed to it...this time, by psychologists...the first and foremost thing is to follow the science--and there is plenty of science out there that debunks #1...you just continue to harp on it because it is not staring you in the face like the Galileo ass handing (which, by the way was debunked by Newton)...
The post implies the science is wrong...and that is not true...just because it conflicts with morality does not make the science incorrect...in fact, the science concludes masturbation is healthy *and* normal with many physical and mental benefits...
No it isn’t? Its saying although the science is correct about stress relief and other such psychological benefits of masturbation, that does not make it a moral act. A sadist would find stress relief in causing the suffering of another, does that make it moral? Obviously not. To argue that masturbation is immoral is obviously much harder than saying torture is morally wrong. However this post is applying Catholic teaching to the topic of masturbation and saying in spite of the benefits you probably shouldn’t if you care about your salvation. I feel you have misunderstood quite a bit.
stop the false equivalency in comparing sadism to a non-sadistic act...the and indeed masturbation is healthy and normal...as far as the moral act, the morality that encourages avoiding something the science determines is healthy and indeed normal should cause pause in all people--because that sounds like a rather sadistic position...
That isn’t what I was doing are you illiterate? I even say that in my paragraph. Are you only here to be a pain and be condescending or do you actually care to understand what the argument is. Because you have argued against things that nobody disagrees with the entire time. It’s not intelligent. You only do yourself a disservice and harm your own intellectual potential by behaving like this
comparing sadism to masturbation is a false equivalency...performing and ad hominem in the form an insult does not disqualify the reply...since you insulted, I am done--I do not put up with that...
Modern psychology views masturbation as a normal, healthy, and natural human behavior that serves physical, emotional, and cognitive functions.
Key Psychological Perspectives on Masturbation
• Stress and Emotion Regulation: Masturbation releases neurochemicals like dopamine, endorphins, oxytocin, and serotonin, which lower cortisol (stress hormones), reduce anxiety, and promote relaxation. Many people use it as a self-soothing or coping mechanism to manage boredom, tension, or emotional distress.
• Sexual Self-Knowledge and Confidence: It allows individuals to explore their own anatomy, discover what brings them pleasure, and understand their personal sexual responses. This self-awareness often translates into better communication and higher satisfaction in partnered relationships.
• Impact on Partnered Relationships: Psychology largely rejects the old myth that masturbation harms romantic or sexual relationships. Instead, it can act as a complement to a shared sex life, help bridge differences in high vs. low sexual desire between partners, and relieve sexual pressure.
• Cognitive Focus: Short-term studies show that post-orgasm neurochemical shifts can create a sense of mental clarity, and minor cognitive tasks (like word recall) sometimes show temporary improvement right after sexual release, though it does not fundamentally alter long-term memory.
The Role of Guilt and "Moral Incongruence"
• Guilt and Shame: Negative feelings after masturbation are rarely caused by the act itself. Psychologists attribute post-masturbation distress to moral incongruence—the internal conflict that happens when a person’s natural behavior clashes with their personal, cultural, or religious upbringing.
• Ego-Dystonic Masturbation: In clinical settings, distress only becomes problematic when a person feels intensely conflicted or guilty about an otherwise normal habit (known as ego-dystonic masturbation), which is often tied to broader anxiety or depression.
When Does It Become Problematic?
Psychology and clinical classifications generally consider masturbation an issue only when it stops being a choice and becomes a compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) or an unhealthy emotional escape. This happens if:
• It interferes with daily responsibilities, work performance, or social relationships.
• It is used habitually to numb or completely avoid facing real-world emotional or relationship problems.
• It causes genuine personal distress rather than relief or pleasure.
For a comprehensive overview of how self-stimulation is viewed across behavioral and social science, explore Psychology Today's Masturbation Guide.
and the next question is: you got your PhD in psychology from where?
I just skimmed through the text and I’m going to do a deep read but I had a question: If Humane Vitae condemns contraception, even a condom with a hole is to a degree restricting the full load of seminal fluid and thus restricting Gods creative power in a way as we are designed for the full load to enter. So would this not too be sinful?
Hilarious!
Once again, this is where an organization interludes into science, and once again, that organization is continuing to get its ass handed to it...this time, by psychologists...the first and foremost thing is to follow the science--and there is plenty of science out there that debunks #1...you just continue to harp on it because it is not staring you in the face like the Galileo ass handing (which, by the way was debunked by Newton)...
I am confused on what your point is. How does this conflict with the post?
The post implies the science is wrong...and that is not true...just because it conflicts with morality does not make the science incorrect...in fact, the science concludes masturbation is healthy *and* normal with many physical and mental benefits...
No it isn’t? Its saying although the science is correct about stress relief and other such psychological benefits of masturbation, that does not make it a moral act. A sadist would find stress relief in causing the suffering of another, does that make it moral? Obviously not. To argue that masturbation is immoral is obviously much harder than saying torture is morally wrong. However this post is applying Catholic teaching to the topic of masturbation and saying in spite of the benefits you probably shouldn’t if you care about your salvation. I feel you have misunderstood quite a bit.
stop the false equivalency in comparing sadism to a non-sadistic act...the and indeed masturbation is healthy and normal...as far as the moral act, the morality that encourages avoiding something the science determines is healthy and indeed normal should cause pause in all people--because that sounds like a rather sadistic position...
That isn’t what I was doing are you illiterate? I even say that in my paragraph. Are you only here to be a pain and be condescending or do you actually care to understand what the argument is. Because you have argued against things that nobody disagrees with the entire time. It’s not intelligent. You only do yourself a disservice and harm your own intellectual potential by behaving like this
comparing sadism to masturbation is a false equivalency...performing and ad hominem in the form an insult does not disqualify the reply...since you insulted, I am done--I do not put up with that...
The science debunks the science that masturbation is a common human behaviour especially in sexually developing humans?
ummm...no...apparently does not...
Modern psychology views masturbation as a normal, healthy, and natural human behavior that serves physical, emotional, and cognitive functions.
Key Psychological Perspectives on Masturbation
• Stress and Emotion Regulation: Masturbation releases neurochemicals like dopamine, endorphins, oxytocin, and serotonin, which lower cortisol (stress hormones), reduce anxiety, and promote relaxation. Many people use it as a self-soothing or coping mechanism to manage boredom, tension, or emotional distress.
• Sexual Self-Knowledge and Confidence: It allows individuals to explore their own anatomy, discover what brings them pleasure, and understand their personal sexual responses. This self-awareness often translates into better communication and higher satisfaction in partnered relationships.
• Impact on Partnered Relationships: Psychology largely rejects the old myth that masturbation harms romantic or sexual relationships. Instead, it can act as a complement to a shared sex life, help bridge differences in high vs. low sexual desire between partners, and relieve sexual pressure.
• Cognitive Focus: Short-term studies show that post-orgasm neurochemical shifts can create a sense of mental clarity, and minor cognitive tasks (like word recall) sometimes show temporary improvement right after sexual release, though it does not fundamentally alter long-term memory.
The Role of Guilt and "Moral Incongruence"
• Guilt and Shame: Negative feelings after masturbation are rarely caused by the act itself. Psychologists attribute post-masturbation distress to moral incongruence—the internal conflict that happens when a person’s natural behavior clashes with their personal, cultural, or religious upbringing.
• Ego-Dystonic Masturbation: In clinical settings, distress only becomes problematic when a person feels intensely conflicted or guilty about an otherwise normal habit (known as ego-dystonic masturbation), which is often tied to broader anxiety or depression.
When Does It Become Problematic?
Psychology and clinical classifications generally consider masturbation an issue only when it stops being a choice and becomes a compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) or an unhealthy emotional escape. This happens if:
• It interferes with daily responsibilities, work performance, or social relationships.
• It is used habitually to numb or completely avoid facing real-world emotional or relationship problems.
• It causes genuine personal distress rather than relief or pleasure.
For a comprehensive overview of how self-stimulation is viewed across behavioral and social science, explore Psychology Today's Masturbation Guide.
and the next question is: you got your PhD in psychology from where?
Follow up question, you got your MD from where???
I just skimmed through the text and I’m going to do a deep read but I had a question: If Humane Vitae condemns contraception, even a condom with a hole is to a degree restricting the full load of seminal fluid and thus restricting Gods creative power in a way as we are designed for the full load to enter. So would this not too be sinful?